Performance: GRPC uses binary data format, which is smaller and faster. Most of the time, the processing time increases at a faster rate than the request increases, which is good It means we aren't exponentially taking more and more time to process more requests. Both Rest and gRPC roughly track the increase. The diagram below highlights the difference between the existing Grpc.Core library and the new grpc-dotnet libraries. GRPC has the following advantages over REST APIs for microservices communication: 1. Based on the results above, it's a bit hit or miss. Unlike the existing C-Core based implementation ( Grpc.Core ), the new libraries ( grpc-dotnet ) make use of the existing networking primitives in the. Both implementations share the same API for invoking and handling RPCs, thus limiting the lock-in and enabling users to choose the implementation that satisfies their needs the best. The implementations coexist side-by-side and each has its own advantages in terms of available features, integrations, supported platforms, maturity level and performance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |